Gentleman of the jungle critical analysis

The man in the story symbolises the individual Africans who were affected by the brutality and corruption of the European colonizers. Cultural critics see The Jungle as a text that is both representative of time and place as well as simultaneously having an effect on future cultures.

Lions are brave; wolves are cruel, horses proud and foxes cunning.

The Gentlemen of the Jungle by Jomo Kenyatta

The Immigrant Experience and the Hollowness of the American Dream Because the family that Sinclair uses to represent the struggle of the working class under capitalism is a group of Lithuanian immigrants, the novel is also able to explore the plight of immigrants in America.

How corrupt the animals are in the story is noticeable by the fact that they all take the side of Mr Elephant. This lack of aesthetics mixed with an unpopular message resulted in a lack of respect for The Jungle in literary circles.

This man is fooled by an elephant that pretends to be his friend and a dispute begins therefore between them. The implication is an imbalance between the terms where one is superior and the other inferior. He Gentleman of the jungle critical analysis emphasizes that their values of hard work, family togetherness, honesty, and thrift are those of the American reading public.

New Critics argue that Sinclair uses the form of the novel to promote his political agenda at the expense of his art. The fable wants to teach a moral lesson, and often that moral is expressed explicitly at the end.

Disregarding the opinions or desires of African people in general to satisfy their own selfish desires. Assets that did not belong to them and which they inevitably took by force. While the Kikuyu tribal lands that would form the basis of the future nation of Kenya were spared the In The Gentlemen of the Jungle, the main characters are an elephant, a lion, a buffalo, an alligator, a rhinocerosa leopard, a hyena, a fox and a man.

They took the European colonizers at face value and did not imagine that they could in reality be stripping the land of its natural resources.

Instead of literature consisting of a body of works, it consists of a set of texts that act as models for that particular culture.

His text created a kind of power over the industry and was a means of change. For cultural critics, what is traditionally referred to as literature is neither superior nor inferior to the non-literary works of a particular period.

The lion, king of the jungle, offers the man the opportunity to state his case before a Commission entirely composed of animals, whose impartiality is consequently doubtful, to such an extent that the elephant is declared innocent and the man has to give up his hut and build another one somewhere else.

When socialism is introduced, it is shown to be as good as capitalism is evil; whereas capitalism destroys the many for the benefit of the few, socialism works for the benefit of everyone.

New Critics focus on the written work isolated from everything else because, they believe that, by closely examining the way the author uses language, one is eventually able to establish the true meaning of the work. Rather, they examine how particular texts use or do not use particular devices and determine how this affects the reception of a text.

No longer is he under the control of the animals and the reader senses that life will be easier for the man. The text continues to influence culture, regardless of its accuracy or immediacy.

The Jungle

Recognizing the slanted perspective of any such commission that comprises all animals and no men, the man voices his complaint, to which the lion replies in a manner suggestive of the arrogance and condescending attitudes of whites who impose themselves over native tribes: The end of the story is also interesting as Kenyatta appears to be introducing the theme of rebellion.

Further, that there was nothing to fear, for the members of the Commission were all men of repute for their impartiality in justice, and as they were gentlemen chosen by God to look after the interests of races less adequately endowed with teeth and claws, he might rest assured that they would investigate the matter with the greatest care and report impartially.

This may be important as each animal mentioned in the story symbolises European colonizers and Kenyatta may be suggesting that just as Mr Elephant is taking things which are not his. The author has treated the themes of injustice, abuse of power and racism in a colourful, simple and sober style, but the moral is clear and brilliant.

The reality was very much different. None of the animals or colonizers in the story would be considered to be gentlemen. The Gentlemen of the Jungle tells us the story of a man living alone in the jungle with many animals. From the outset, they maintain an unshakable faith in the American Dream—the idea that hard work and morality will yield material success and happiness.With their dispute, they catch every animal’s attention in the jungle including the king, the lion.

During a storm, the elephant asks the man if he could share his hut with his trunk. When the man agrees, the elephant ends up kicking out the man. The Gentlemen of the Jungle by Jomo Kenyatta The Gentlemen of the Jungle is a short story written by Jomo Kenyatta. The story is humoristic and/5(1).

In this story, for me, a gentleman means good and innocent people while jungle, of course the only haven which wild animals lived. Animals who have the same attitudes, personality, just like citizen in a particular country.

Themes The main themes of the short story “The Gentlemen of the Jungle” by Jomo Kenyatta are that of colonialism and racism and discrimination, which are emphasised through motifs like. The Jungle Analysis Literary Devices in The Jungle. Symbolism, Imagery, Allegory. The Jungle is actually pretty low on symbolism, perhaps because it is a piece of journalism and social criticism.

When a writer is trying to jab at real-life big business, he usually doesn't want t. In the end, all the animals, so called Gentlemen of The Jungle, were burned to death when they occupied a larger hut the man created in order to trap them.

The s was a time of massive political and social changes in Africa, for Africans were implementing new ways of escaping the umbrella of European occupation/5(7).

Gentleman of the jungle critical analysis
Rated 4/5 based on 5 review