Overall the economic issues that faced Russia most definitely forced Stalin and his government to take drastic action. Another factor that shows that the purges may have been carried out for economic reasons is the benefits they had for the government, as it was able to provide both scapegoats and a slave workforce.
He writes that while never clinically diagnosed with paranoia, Stalin exhibits the behaviors of someone who suffers from paranoia as well as extreme narcissism. Stalin was obsessed with maintaining his position of power and by purging the party internally he was able to eliminate any potential enemies.
They all knew that he did virtually nothing in the revolution. Fascists sought to rejuvenate their nation based on commitment to the national community as an organic entity in which individuals are bound together by suprapersonal connections of ancestry, culture, and blood.
Duke University Press, The following online news stories explain in English! However, although Stalin did enforce "russification" of the Soviet Union, his main enemies were his political opponents and their followers.
The instability in the cities may also have been a contributing factor as the purges helped quell the violence. Tucker says that their needs as paranoidal people were powerful motivating factors in dictatorial decision making and were not confined to their personal lives.
Birt claims his behavior while in power is indicative of a paranoid need to protect his narcissistic ego from external threats. So he purged them. History textbooks and photographs were changed to make him the hero of the Revolution, and obliterate the names of purged people.
Distributed by Random House, These fellow Bolsheviks used the purges to get themselves into new positions with better privileges.
As production levels were levelling off and the Five Year Plans were falling behind schedule Stalin needed to take action to find scapegoats and ways to increase productivity. Whilst gaining control of the party Stalin was able to make people fully aware that he had the power to take — or give — anything.
Stalin may also have been attempting to make a race of Russians entirely devoted to him. It was made clear that no-one was safe from these purges as even Politburo members Zinoviev and Kamenev were put on a public show trial, therefore sending the message that no-one regardless of rank and revolutionary pedigree was safe.
An indication of the vast scope of the Great Purge was the discovery, during the Second World War, in Vinnytsia Ukraine of a mass grave containing 10, bodies of residents of the region who were shot between and A Note On the Consequence of the Expansion of the Red Army On the Eve of World War II In this article, also by Reese, the author hypothesizes that the ineffectiveness of the Red Army in the opening stages of the second world war is a result of the rapid expansion of the Army in the years leading up to the war as opposed to the purge.
Paranoia also played a part in the purging of Bukharin. Words Social Instability In the main industrial cities, there was much disruption and dissent amongst the workers. Stalin did play a role in purging the workers and peasants but it was not his paranoia that pushed him to make these decisions, it was his obsession with making Russia great no matter what the cost.
The Case of Stalin.
He even purged the Red Army at a time in which the Soviet Union was engaged in international conflict. Special Tasks is the autobiography of Pavel Sudoplatov, a General in the Soviet intelligence services.
There are those that would argue that the purges were caused by communism itself in the sense that it was necessary for the continuation and evolution of communism. Power was heavily centralised within the party and even though others might have carried out the murders, it was Stalin who ordered them.
So the slave labour force of the gulags could build them, for example the White Sea Canal project and the Palace of the Soviets which was never built.Was Stalin’s paranoia the driving force in the creation of the purges, or was Stalin merely pushed by his obsession with power?
Words Economic Problems There was a great deal of opposition to Stalin’s economic policies in the s, and it can be argued that this.
Feb 07, · So as Stalin discovered this growing opposition in the population, so the amount of purges grew. He was paranoid about any sort of mass uprising and could justify purging the causes of unrest by saying they were anti-Bolshevik and anti-revolution, while perhaps just being anti-Stalin.
Much of Stalin’s paranoid fixation about the Red Army was focused on its head, Marshal Mikhail Tukhachevsky. As brutal as Stalin in quelling opposition, using poison gas on revolting peasants, and executing reform-seeking sailors, Tukhachevsky was a brilliant advocate of armored warfare.
Just as Stalin's nature led to the Purges, growing from Bolshevism, Yezhov's nature led to the Yezhovschina growing from the Purges. Stalin did not initiate the Purges because of a desire to make economic scapegoats or unify the country in foreign policy opinion, but whilst the Purge occurred he seized these opportunities.
2. How did the Great Purge demonstrate Joseph Stalin’s paranoia? a. The purge targeted those who might challenge Stalin’s power. b. Stalin used the purge to strengthen the Communist Party/5(7). Joseph Stalin’s tenure as the Soviet Union’s head of State is remembered largely for his domestic policies like the First Five Year Plan, but also his paranoia fueled purges of the Soviet people and the Communist Party.Download